Recent Blog Posts
Dividing a Tax Refund Following a Divorce
If you completed the process of divorce last year, filing your income taxes this year has probably raised a number of questions. (If you have not yet filed, the deadline for personal income tax returns is fast approaching. Presuming your divorce finalized on or before December 31, 2016, you almost certainly filed this year’s taxes as a single filer. Many single filers still end up receiving a refund for overpaid taxes, but if you have recently divorced, you may not be entitled to keep your entire refund for yourself.
A Tax Refund Is Not New Income
In an Illinois divorce proceeding, a couple’s marital property must be divided equitably between the spouses. Marital property, in general, refers to all assets and debts acquired by each spouse during the marriage, with a few limited exceptions. All other property, including that acquired before the marriage or after the divorce finalizes, is considered non-marital or separate property.
Dealing With False Accusations of Domestic Violence
False accusations of domestic violence are, sadly, all too common in family law cases. Such allegations are problematic for a number of reasons. First, they undermine legitimate efforts by organizations throughout the country to prevent and eliminate the very real problem of domestic abuse that occurs in many families. Of course, false accusations also create serious issues for the person who has been accused. If that person is you, it is important to understand what you can do in family court to defend yourself.
Protective Orders and Temporary Restraining Orders
Victims and purported victims of domestic violence in Illinois are able to apply for an emergency protective order or a temporary restraining order without any advance notice to the alleged abuser. If the court finds that the victim is currently in danger and immediate action is required to keep him or her safe, an order of protection will be issued. Once the order is issued, a law enforcement officer will serve a copy of the order on the alleged abuser.
Oral Agreements and Divorce Settlements
There are many alternatives to litigation when it comes to divorce, including mediation and collaborative law. When these alternatives are successful, the parties must still submit a final agreement to the court. A settlement agreement, after all, is a legally binding contract. But at what point is the settlement binding? Can you agree to a settlement and then change your mind at the last minute? A recent Illinois divorce case illustrates how courts may deal with such a scenario.
Court Rejects Husband's Effort to “Back Out” of Agreement
The parties in this case were married for about 16 years. The wife filed for divorce in 2013. Following a lengthy financial discovery process, their case was scheduled for trial at the end of 2015. At a scheduled deposition in October 2015, the parties opted to have a settlement conference instead.
The parties emerged from the conference with an oral agreement, which they presented to the trial judge. The wife's attorney read the terms of the deal to the judge. The judge then asked both the husband and wife if they had participated in the negotiation of these terms, that they understood those terms, and they “agree to bound” by the. Both spouses responded yes to all three questions. Based on this, the judge ordered a follow-up hearing, at which time the parties would present a final written agreement incorporating the terms of the oral settlement.
The Dangers of Hidden Assets in Divorce
A divorce is rarely an easy undertaking and, in some cases, can be extremely complex, especially if you fear that your spouse is not being honest about his or her financial situation. Hidden assets can prevent the court from putting together an accurate assessment of the marital estate, which could affect not only the property division process but issues related to spousal and child support as well.
What is a Hidden Asset?
While it is possible for a spouse to hide assets while living in the marital home during the marriage, it becomes even easier to hide assets following a separation. If you and your spouse are living apart, he or she could have opened secret accounts, started working under the table, received gifts from friends, or made undisclosed investments. Hidden assets may also take the form of physical items like jewelry, furniture, artwork, and real estate.
Revenue streams and income are often hidden by a spouse simply neglecting to disclose them during the divorce proceedings. It is also possible for a spouse to ask friends or family members to hold on to certain items or assets until the divorce is finalized. Physical items may actually be hidden in a safety deposit box or other discrete places as well. Regardless of how an asset is hidden, if discovered, the court will not look favorably on the behavior and may even order sanctions to be paid by the offending spouse.
How the Economy Can Affect Divorce Rates
While a marriage or divorce is often the result of a combination of emotional factors, it impossible to deny that finances play a major role in both. In marriage, tax benefits are generally available for both spouse, and the idea of combining two incomes is often a motivating factor—especially for younger couples looking to make ends meet.
Similarly, divorce also effects requires a number of financial changes and places economic demands on recent ex-spouses who must adapt to living on their own. It is little wonder that health of the national economy can be an influential force when it comes to keeping a marriage together or tearing it apart.
Money Matters
It may seem logical to assume that struggling economy would make life more difficult for married couples, creating added stress and pushing them toward divorce. In reality, however, the opposite seems to be true. Tough economic times tend to affect everyone in certain ways, but statistics suggest that a recessed economy actually keeps couples together rather than driving them apart. For some couples, this may be a result of trying a little harder in difficult times. For others, however, the question is simply one of money.
The Rights of Grandparents After an Adoption
Allocating parental responsibilities often involves more than just parents and children. Grandparents and other family members often play a critical role in a child's life. For this reason, Illinois low allows grandparents to seek court-ordered visitation rights with a child.
It is important to understand that the law presumes that a parent is fit to make decisions regarding their child. This includes where and when to let a grandparent visit. If, however, the grandparent can prove to the court that the parent's denial of access is both unreasonable and harmful to the child's "mental, physical, or emotional health," a judge can override the parent after considering a number of factors.
Court Holds Oral Visitation Agreement Unenforceable in Illinois
But what about cases where a parent has severed their legal parental rights by consenting to their child's adoption? Can the grandparents still seek visitation rights? An Illinois appeals court recently answered that question in the negative.
Dividing Marital Property: Will I Get Half of Everything?
When a couple gets divorced, one of the most contentious aspects of the process involves the identification and division of marital property. For many couples, the marital estate is a physical representation of their life together, making it very difficult for the parties to reach a reasonable resolution.
If you and your spouse cannot come to an agreement regarding your property, the issue will be left to the court to decide. Such a situation leads many to assume that the court will simply divide the marital estate into equal halves, and allocate 50 percent of the marital property to one spouse and 50 percent to the other. According to Illinois law, however, this is not exactly the case.
Equitable Distribution
The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act provides that during a divorce, marital property is to be divided between the spouses in a manner that is equitable and just. The law does not promise or even imply that each spouse should receive an equal share. Instead, the court is required to consider the totality of the situation in determining how to allocate the marital estate.
Emotional Abuse and Gray Divorce
Over the last several decades, the phenomenon of gray divorce or the divorce of couples consisting of partners aged 50 and over has been on the rise. More than two-thirds of these types of divorces are initiated by the wife, and in at least one survey, over half of the women who responded said that they initiated the divorce due to spousal abuse. In most cases, the divorce was the result of emotional abuse.
In an emotionally abusive marriage, one spouse manipulates the other using methods such as criticism, intimidation, or bullying. The victim can do "nothing right," and the cycle of abuse continues. This type of abuse is often present at the beginning of the relationship, but is usually concealed as love, concern, or even humor. It often takes years—sometimes many years—for victims to realize they are being abused, if they realize it at all.
Warning Signs of an Abusive Marriage
One of the most obvious red flags of an emotionally abusive relationship is a lack of autonomy for one spouse. When this is the case, one spouse has too much control over the other. In cases where women are the victims, the woman must watch what she says, wears, or does out of fear of reprisal. Her spouse may have specific rules—often inconsistent—that she must follow or there will be conflict. Although it takes time, many women finally realize they are in an abusive marriage, and a percentage of such women find the strength to end their marriages.
Why Some Happy Couples Sleep in Separate Rooms
Most married couples look forward to sharing a bed after a long day. Spending time being physically close to your partner is an important component to any romantic relationship. A lack of physical intimacy is often associated with a higher likelihood of divorce. According to a study by the National Sleep Foundation, however, many married couples are choosing to sleep in separate bedrooms.
A Better Night's Rest Can Lead to a Healthier Relationship
Whether we like to admit it or not, most of us have at least some annoying nighttime habits. Some snore loudly or toss and turn; others talk in their sleep or sleepwalk. A person may get up to go to the bathroom several times throughout the night or be unable to stay asleep because of insomnia or other health issues. All of these interruptions can lead to a very unrestful night for a partner sharing the same bed. After a night of being interrupted and getting little quality sleep, a person is likely to be grumpy and irritable. Some may even feel anger or resentment towards their partner for disrupting their sleep – even if they know it is not their partner’s fault. This resentment can build up over time and be a catalyst for arguing and poor communication between spouses.
Understanding Dissipation: My Spouse Claims I Wasted Marital Money
During a divorce, it is not uncommon for spouses to make all sorts of accusations against one another. Some, as you might expect, are fairly reasonable while others may border on the completely outrageous. One of the most common allegations that tend to arise in a divorce case is that of dissipation. Dissipation refers to the wasteful spending, intentional destruction, or negligent devaluation of marital property and is a very serious charge.
Why Does Dissipation Matter?
In the course of a marriage, spouses have the freedom to do whatever they want their property. The can spend frivolously, save carefully, or find a balance somewhere in between. Divorce law in Illinois provides, however, that once the marriage has begun to irretrievably break down, how each spouse spends money becomes a matter of interest to the other spouse. This is because Illinois law requires that the marital property of a couple shall be divided equitably between the parties during the divorce. If one spouse wastes assets before the divorce can be finalized, he or she denies the other spouse the opportunity to receive a share of those assets.